Case study

Helping small business owners make better financial decisions.

Redesigning the language and content paths in Meta's advertising tools so people spending their own money could do it with confidence.

ClientMeta (Facebook for Business)
RoleContent Designer
Timeline8 weeks
Result2.8% increase in advertising activity within 2 weeks

The challenge

Facebook's new profile experience let entrepreneurs and creators promote their brand through advertising. But small business owners were not confident about running ads. The language and structure of the product had been designed around Facebook's internal terminology, not around how business owners actually thought about advertising.

What we heard in research
"I want to run an ad but I can't figure out where to start. I see Promote but I don't know what that means for my business."
Small business owner, retail
"I expected to find advertising under Tools. That's where I'd look. It's not there so I just gave up."
Small business owner, services
"Promote sounds like I'm boosting a post. I want to actually advertise my business. Those feel like different things."
Small business owner, food and beverage
"I clicked on it once and got lost. Now I just don't touch it. I don't want to accidentally spend money on something I don't understand."
Small business owner, e-commerce

User research revealed business owners were confused by terminology and could not find advertising tools where they expected them.

Through research and interviews, I identified two core problems.

Creator-centric language did not resonate. A button that said "Promote" sounded vague and passive. Business owners who wanted to advertise were looking for direct, action-oriented language. They did not think of advertising as "promoting." They thought of it as creating an ad.

Navigation did not match mental models. Business admins expected to find ad tools under "Tools" and were frustrated not to find them there. The navigation did not match their expectation of where advertising belongs.

The process

I contributed to this 8-week remote project and collaborated closely with product design and engineers.

1
User interviews
Observed conversations with small business owners to understand their vocabulary, expectations, and mental models around advertising.
2
Friction mapping
Walked through the advertising flow with engineers to identify every point where language or structure caused hesitation or drop-off.
3
Design exploration
Proposed terminology changes, alternate navigation paths, and educational content to support business owners at each decision point.
4
Prototype and launch
Tested changes with business owners, refined based on feedback, and launched the updated experience within the 8-week timeline.

The project moved from user interviews through friction identification, design exploration, and launch in 8 weeks.

I observed interviews with small businesses to understand their vocabulary and expectations. I then went through the advertising flow with engineers to identify different scenarios that would cause friction. Working with my product design partner, I proposed terminology changes, alternate paths to resolution, and education content during different parts of the flow.

Before: what business owners were seeing
Promote
Sounds like boosting a post, not creating an ad. Business owners do not associate "Promote" with spending ad budget. The word creates ambiguity at the moment of highest intent.
View Tools
Business admins expected advertising to live here. When they did not find it, many gave up rather than search elsewhere. The label promised the wrong thing.
No alternate paths when lost
When users could not find what they needed, there was no fallback. No guidance, no redirect, no way back in. Confusion became abandonment.

The existing interface used language that did not match how business owners talked about advertising.

The result

Working with my product design partner, I proposed four key changes.

Before
Primary CTA
Promote
Vague. Associated with boosting posts, not advertising.
Navigation label
View Tools
Implied advertising would be here. It was not.
When users got stuck
Dead end
No alternate paths, no guidance, no recovery.
Ad value explanation
None
Users had to already understand why ads were worth it.
After
Primary CTA
Create ad
Direct, matches how business owners talk about advertising.
Navigation label
Manage
Frames navigation around page management, not tool discovery.
When users got stuck
Alternate paths
Content-driven fallbacks so users could find their way without giving up.
Ad value explanation
Educational modals
Showed business owners the potential value of ads while they were deciding.

Four targeted language and navigation changes removed the friction stopping business owners from acting.

Business owners should not have to be experts at advertising. Clear language and education helps them learn while doing.

2.8%
Increase in advertising activity within two weeks of launch

What this shows

When someone is deciding how to spend their money, the language around them needs to be clear, direct, and aligned with how they think. Content design is not just about clarity for its own sake. It is about building the confidence people need to act, especially when the stakes are financial and the person is not an expert.

← Back to all work